Nightcap Nightmare Blog: Development Application for Nightcap Village Refused

September 19, 2020

Development Application for Nightcap Village Refused

Tweed Shire Council voted on September 17, 2020, to reject a request for permission to upgrade road access to a proposed land-share development of 867 dwellings on three properties at Mt Burrell, NSW. It was resolved not to grant consent for any works within the Council owned road reserve.

Council also resolved that no further application by Nightcap Rural Land-sharing Communities for development approval would be permitted.

Each dot on the concept plan represents a proposed residence. The developers have been marketing the venture under various names since 2014. The prospective land-share venture is currently advertised as "Nightcap on Minjungbal" and "Nightcap Village" or "Nightcap Rural Land-sharing Communities".

The request by Nightcap Rural Land-sharing Communities was only for Stage 1 of the prospective development, to upgrade access from Kyogle Road to nine proposed "Rural Land Sharing Communities" with 393 proposed dwellings. Two more access roads were planned, with further associated road works, earthworks and vegetation removal over 11 stages.

Tweed Council's discussion of the request was confidential and video and phone links to the meeting were cut off. Minutes of the vote remain confidential and the outcome has not yet been made public.

Click HERE to read Tweed Shire Council Report

Potential investors are offered title to "Pre-DA Dwelling Sites" under false assurance that limited development approval has already been granted and will soon be extended.

In a June 2020 Nightcap newsletter Richard Moate wrote:

"Most of you are aware of the existing DA approvals for 424 sites, and that over $2.1million dollars was spent on the DA submission of last month, taking the project to over 850 spots."

Concept Plan for Nightcap Village

Freedom of Speech - Denied

Google Corp has summarily removed ten posts from Nightcap Nightmare Blog, in response to a request by Rose Litigation's lawyer Billy Fitzgerald, who represents the sovereignty activists running the Nightcap venture discussed in this blog.

Although the censored posts do not name Mr Fitzgerald's clients, the offending posts have been censored because they supposedly violate injunctions imposed by NSW Supreme Court on the co-author and editor, Gi Linda, who is prohibited from imputing felony to Mr Fitzgerald's clients.

The injunctions are based on a 2020 Supreme Court decision by Fagan J that although more than twenty investors lost life savings amounting to over $2.5 million after they provided equity, loans and purchase money for land in 2014-16, receiving nothing in return, this represents incompetence by Mr Fitzgerald's clients, not fraudulent deception.

Nightcap Nightmare Book in Progress

Nightcap Nightmare is a book in progress, compiled by those ensnared in a land-share community at Mt Burrell, NSW. Compiled by Gi Linda, the book spotlights a communitarian venture run by sovereignty activists who are selling "tribal title" to dwelling sites without development approval, on properties taken from those who paid for the land. It tells how shareholder deals were made with neighbouring landowner Peter van Lieshout, brother of billionaire developer John van Lieshout, before revealing plans to extend aboriginal sovereignty claims across the nation.

The land-share scheme began in 2014 as an intentional community called "Bhula Bhula Village Community," promoted by Mark Darwin through Truthology and Freedom Summits. When the sovereignty activists seized control of the properties, more than twenty families lost life savings totalling over $2.5 million.

Nightcap Nightmare is a compelling true account of the resilience of a group of angry creditors and their quest for truth and justice on the tilted stages of Australian Courts.

Dancing on a Tilted Stage

"Many people ask me how, for seven years, can this mob continue selling homesites with no DA on property they don't own, where multiple occupancy is not permitted, without fulfilling marketing promises? Where is justice?

It is my experience that their false narratives established errors of fact before NSW Supreme Court of Defamation, resulting in misapplication of law and imposition of gag orders.

This interferes with the true exercise of justice and advances dominant commercial interests under colour of law by constraining legitimate freedom of discussion on matters of public concern.

If dominant political and financial interests are also allowed to profit with impunity by summary imposition of draconian censorship by Google Corp, this effectively subverts Constitutional protections over the right to public discourse and due process." Gi Linda

September 19, 2020

Development Application for Nightcap Village Refused

Marketing Hopium

Featured Posts